Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gina Feistel vs Gaeul Jang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Feistel vs Jang analysis and find out who is favored!
Gina Feistel vs Gaeul Jang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Feistel 1 - 0 Jang
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Feistel has won 44.68% of points on his second serve, while Jang has won 43.51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Feistel, in recent form, has won 55.91% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jang has won 54.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.97% and 43.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Feistel has saved 50.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jang has saved 45.3% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Feistel has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 40/ 20), with Jang winning 50% (W/L 10/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Feistel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 35/ 19), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3). Jang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 12/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 12/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Feistel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 80.65% of matches (W/L 25/ 6), where as Jang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 8/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Feistel winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Feistel winning 2 and Jang winning 1. The last match between Feistel and Jang was at the W15 Monastir, 28-03-2024, Second, Hard with Gina Feistel getting the victory 2-6 6-0 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Feistel and Jang have played a deciding set 1 times, with Feistel winning 1 times and Jang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Feistel winning 0, and Jang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Feistel has played against opponents with an average rank of 267.08 while Jang has played against players with an average rank of 200.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Feistel has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jang has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Feistel has converted 44.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jang has converted 46.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Feistel 1 - 0 Jang
516
Rank
516
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
17
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
61% (70-45)
Career Total W/L
52% (12-11)
62% (13-8)
YTD W/L
53% (8-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gina Feistel | Gaeul Jang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:12:0 | 2:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (54/82) | 54% (39/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (36/54) | 59% (23/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 39% (11/28) | 48% (16/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (33/72) | 43% (35/82) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-0 6-4 |
Stats 
Gina Feistel
Player
Gaeul Jang
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gina Feistel | Gaeul Jang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (13/8) | 53% (8/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (28/23) | 57% (21/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (246/224) | 51% (164/155) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 53% (8/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 6 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.43 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 67 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:48 | 1:49:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 380.29 | 230 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (1117/1560) | 55% (568/1030) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (634/1117) | 61% (349/568) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (200/443) | 44% (201/462) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (101/233) | 47% (67/143) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (789/1645) | 47% (499/1057) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (9/3) | 57% (8/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (13/21) | 53% (8/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 67% (9/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 33% (9/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 42% (12/5) | 33% (6/2) |
Gina Feistel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Gina Feistel
60%
(
71 of
119)
1st Serve %
84%
(
127 of
151)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
64 of
127)
40%
(
19 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
31%
(
8 of
26)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
52 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
74 of
151)
141
Total Points Won
129
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Barbora Palicova
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Mona Barthel
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve %
49%
(
56 of
114)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
100
Total Points Won
106
|
1-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
60 of
83)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
42%
(
23 of
55)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
55%
(
42 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
47 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentina Ryser
Player
Gina Feistel
63%
(
81 of
129)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
42%
(
54 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
115
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Emily Seibold
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
79%
(
92 of
117)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
50 of
92)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
117)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Joelle Steur
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
61 of
76)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Caroline Werner
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
67%
(
69 of
103)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
41%
(
9 of
22)
Break Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
47%
(
48 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
52 of
89)
107
Total Points Won
85
|
5-7 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Caroline Brack
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
17 of
35)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gaeul Jang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Yidi Yang
Player
Gaeul Jang
71%
(
70 of
98)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Gaeul Jang
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gaeul Jang
Player
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anastasia Kulikova
Player
Gaeul Jang
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gaeul Jang
Player
Lara Pfeifer
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gaeul Jang
Player
Alessia Popescu
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gaeul Jang
Player
Amelie Smejkalova
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Gaeul Jang
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gaeul Jang
Player
Mika Stojsavljevic
38%
(
31 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
1
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
6
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
38%
(
19 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
54%
(
44 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
85
Total Points Won
91
|
0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Gaeul Jang
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Feistel Vs Jang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
